Sunday 28 October 2012

SALT News: Merger Discussion

I've already contacted most of SALT about this, but on the off chance I've missed someone (sorry), here's a quick run down and a link towards relevant reading material.

Essentially, there has been a proposal towards merging SALT and TWE, or Train-Wreck Explorers. The actual proposal from TWE is placed below. Your opinion on how we respond to this should be posted below; I would also be grateful if we could avoid trying to convince or sway other people's opinions.

A few members mentioned that they weren't sure what, exactly, the TWE are. The link on their name takes you to the group, where you should be able to gather an opinion on them.

I would like to stress that this has been initiated by both groups; this is not a case of one group wanting to take over another. Both Ravens and Csquared08 -- essentially, the (co)founders of both groups -- were involved in this issue's formation.

Here is the proposal itself, as sent from Csquared08 to me:

So, we talked about the whole SALT-TWE merger on Skype for a bit. A lot of ideas were brought up, and just as many were shut down. And nearly every Admin was there, so this is coming from all of us.

Anywho, this is the basic idea of what we're proposing:

We're going to do a full merge with SALT. They're all going to join us and such. We will then have a second group for mentoring purposes run mostly by the old SALT guys and any of our guys that want to try mentoring. There will be clear links and such to the second group.

Now, that's incredibly basic, so I'll expand on that for a bit.

Idea the first: We're going to do a full merge with SALT. They're all going to join us and such.

This is pretty simple. You all find the TWE homepage and click the "Join Group" button. However, joining the group brings no obligations you in of itself. If the SALT Admins/leadership wishes to retain some sense of authority, we'll be fine with adding you as Admins/Mods. We can work the specifics out later, but I figured it was worth mentioning that we're open to that idea. Now, as for other things within the group, there's the matter of being an approved reviewer. Preferably, if we're gonna add you to the list on the front page, we'd like to see how you handle reviewing something truly awful. If that's not something you want to do, that's perfectly fine. Don't worry about it. That's all up to you. Just do keep in mind that we prefer to have our Admins and Mods active within the group in some way.

Idea the second: We will then have a second group for mentoring purposes run mostly by the old SALT guys and any of our guys that want to try mentoring.

Now this is the real meat and potatoes of the proposal.
So, a bit of background first. The TWE is a group that is dedicated to finding the terrible fanfics published on a daily basis and give a review to the author explaining in varying amounts of detail just how bad the story is. Most of the time, the reviews are fairly lengthy and deal with many of the structural problems in the story. From that point, we're done with the story unless the author comes to us asking for additional help. We are not there to mentor the author the whole way through the writing process.

Additionally, there is also this thread in which anyone can ask for a review of their story, good or bad. Now, I honestly have no idea how well this is maintained, which is a problem in of itself. This is one thing we're not particularly organized about, and we should work on that.

That's where you guys and the second group come in. The second group (we'll call it the "Engineers" right now for simplicity's sake; the name, of course, is subject to change pending further discussion) is where we deal with authors like those in the above thread. This is a private group where membership is by invite only. So the goal of the Engineers would be to mentor authors and work with them one-on-one. As far as I know, that's what you guys at SALT try to do.

So that's the key difference here. The Explorers find the fics, the approved reviewers give off a nice long review, and that's that. Interested authors (either from a horrible story we've reviewed or a member looking to improve his story) are then pointed to the Engineers. Somehow, however the management over at the Engineers decides to do it, the interested author expresses his interest to have his story reviewed one-on-one by a mentor. A mentor then claims the author, and the matter is then handled from there by the mentor. Now, obviously there will need to be a way to make sure other mentors know an author is already claimed so that an author isn't flooded with people looking to provide one-on-one help. But that starts to go into how the management of the Engineers decides to run things which isn't exactly relevant to the proposal itself. The kinks can be worked out in due time.

So there's also the matter of how mentors are acquired/approved. Much like our reviewer application thread, we will have a thread where people apply to become a mentor (and thus join the Engineers as well. Remember, that's a private group that's invite-only so that only approved mentors are there and maybe one or two guys for group management purposes, like me). However, unlike our reviewer application thread, the mentor approval process will be much more strict. Only the best of the best will be approved (I imagine one of you guys will do the approving).

Of course, picking up an author is entirely up to each individual mentor. If one mentor doesn't want to deal with a particular subject, then he/she can just as easily let another mentor take care of it. But I digress. These are all details that can be dealt with later. The point is, mentors have a choice in who and what they take on as "students."

So if all of that makes sense, you guys at SALT who don't want to deal terrible train wrecks don't have to. You can keep doing what you're doing, but in what is hopefully a more organized and streamlined manner.

Also, another small matter is sending over some of our Admins over to the Engineers. Just like we're open to the idea of you guys coming in with administrative roles, we trust you'd be open to the same idea. Of course, as I said before, specifics can be worked out later, but I thought this was another thing worth mentioning.

And finally, idea the third: There will be clear links and such to the second group.

This is quite simple. To make things easy for everyone, there will be a clearly marked mentor application thread. There will also be a thread with a link to the Engineers that explains just exactly what's going on with the engineers. In case you haven't noticed, we have a nice big, bold, blue link on the front page to a "Required Reading" thread with links to lots of things every Explorer should at least be aware of. This is our solution to the lack of stickies and should hopefully be adequate in making members aware of the Engineers and the services they provide.

As far as I can tell, this covers all aspects of the proposal and should make things fairly clear on what we're looking for in a possible merger.

Cheers!


Opinions below, please. I will probably be a bit delayed on mine.

28 comments:

  1. Okay, as I've pretty much been in the middle of these talks, I probably shouldn't shill too much either way.
    Basically, I'm in favor of this idea for a few reasons:
    1) It gives us a MUCH larger pool of both editors and people requesting help. The TWE has people requesting assistance pretty regularly, but they're not really set up for that, and most of the reviewers aren't the type for it. We most definitely are.
    2) It would allow us to control who gets to be an approved mentor, so we can make sure people really know their stuff and we can be very professional about it.
    3) We really don't have an on-site presence on FiMFic, and this is a wide-open invitation to hundreds of eyes a day, almost. The regular TWE reviewers hit just about every fic that gets posted, it seems, and writers that show promise would be directed to us in droves.
    4) STRUCTURE. We lack it now. TWE has built in hierarchy and methodology, which would make it much easier for us to do our jobs, AND easier to make sure people get helped without everyone getting overwhelmed.

    -OtterMatt, TWE and SALT member

    ReplyDelete
  2. Something that strikes me is that C^2 seems to think we only work one-on-one with authors. Sure, that's the case when only one of our members decides to look at a story, but I'm far more used to multiple people reviewing/editing. I'm more comfortable with that, too, considering that I've never seen one person catch every problem that a fic has.

    We've each got our own strengths and weaknesses, editing/proofreading/reviewing-wise (I, for example, am very strong when it comes to spelling/grammar/logic/proper phrase usage, and most technical things, but weak with plot structure and the like), so I'm not sure it's a good idea to force one-on-one interaction. As it is, I don't feel that I'm good enough to be this perfect being that is able to point out every area of a story that needs work, and I worry that nobody really is. Where would that leave me?

    I would suggest the system not call for hard and fast one-on-one interaction. Maybe the cap should be left up to the author. Think that's a possibility?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, and I'm Burraku_Pansa, if anyone wasn't aware.

      Also, something I mentioned in response to Ravens' blog post that I think I should reiterate here: I would prefer it if the name we give to this group doesn't explicitly link us to TWE. Info and a link on the page is fine, but if the name had "Train Wreck" or the like in it, I wouldn't be entirely comfortable with that. If my preferences count for much.

      Delete
    2. This comment has been removed by the author.

      Delete
    3. "I would suggest the system not call for hard and fast one-on-one interaction. Maybe the cap should be left up to the author. Think that's a possibility?"
      Of course it's a possibility. As I said, it'll mostly be you guys running the show for the second group. And specifics of how things are done can be worked out later. This is mostly a general idea of how the groups would interact and work off each other. Foundation first and specifics later, no?

      Delete
  3. Ahoy there, Plum from the TWE here.

    The name is entirely up to the members who'll run the group. If you don't want Train Wreck in there, no problem.

    As for the system, there's no reason why more than one advisor can't help on a fic. The system CS suggested was just a way to make sure people knew who was helping with what.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This was intended to be a reply to Burraku, but Blogger's cocked it up, apparently.

      Delete
  4. Replies
    1. THEN GIVE US YOUR OPINION!!!

      Shesh, some ponies... :P

      Delete
    2. Right, well, you know how much time I spent with SALT?

      Very, very little.

      It was just a site I hopped onto once in a blue moon to help some new writer, because it makes me feel good.

      I was always too busy, so I'm prolly going to do the same with this new group.

      Delete
  5. I'd reccomend that one person in the group claim it, sort of as the head mentor or whatever, but the author can open it up for as many opinions as he wants. I just want to avoid writers getting overwhelmed by multiple people if they don't want that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ok. Opinion dump.

    Is this is a good thing for SALT? Difficult to say. If you view SALT as a collection of sites, then no: this is essentially the funeral bell for SALT. Everything's getting dissolved and poured into a new group; SALT will be no more by the end of this.

    On the other hand, SALT is also a collection of editors, of people. The site is merely meant to make things easier for them to review, and reviewing will continue regardless of whatever decision is taken here. It'll be a different form of reviewing, but reviewing nonetheless.

    Overall, this is probably beneficial to SALT. Reviewers are gained and a wider user base is added. Should this go ahead? Probably.

    I won't be going through with it, though. I'd like anyone reading this to bear in mind that, after this paragraph, the entire thing is going to be based on my personal preferences. If you disagree with them, then fine; I would however ask that you do not attempt to convince me to abandon them. I pride myself on knowing my own mind: these issues are not up for debate.

    I said before that this doesn't mesh with my style, and it still doesn't. I have no real interest in reviewing for TWE. When I review on the front page of Fim., I review by impulse, in much the same way that I read stories from the front page by impulse. I do not review on Fim. as a member of SALT; I review as myself (and, occasionally, as a few other users when I think the author may be a pain in their response). There is no real need for me to join TWE, nor would I be interested in reviewing the main body of works TWE deals with. I can’t see any advantages gained by either myself or TWE by doing this: I have no desire to represent anything larger that myself, nor do I expect TWE to have much of a desire to have members who exist in name only.

    So the first idea does not appeal to me. On to the second.

    I don't like the idea of mentoring: it sets up a relationship that, to my mind, is bizarre when it comes to the writing of fanfiction. I try and treat everyone in every one of my reactions as an equal -- or a friend -- no matter how it raises or lowers them. I’ve found that it’s the best and most rewarding attitude to take

    That's a side issue, though it is related to this one, my main cause for disagreement with this section: I'm not a fan of the responsibility. SALT works for me because, when I feel the urge to review, there are, more often than not, fics ready and waiting for me to delve into. There is, however, no commandment that I have to review them -- if I do not feel like it is worth my time or am simply not in the mood, I can choose not to take it. Selfish, yes, but honest. I prefer by nature to be an anonymous commentator, partially because it allows me to walk away at any time. The merge would remove one of my primary reasons for being a part of SALT.

    So yes: the second idea does not agree with me. I think that it is probably a good idea, and I encourage its establishment and growth, but I do not want to be a part of it.

    And that’s that (the third ideas based upon acceptance of the second; there’s no real need for me to discuss my opinions on it).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well, I could say how there are answers for those concerns, but really, SALT is just you and cheeze editing, and (at least for the last few months) hosting prompt contests. If you aren't gonna come over at any point, then it's really a moot point. SALT is done in any case, and TWE should just make their own forum.

      Delete
  7. Alrighty, well, if anyone wants to hear the thoughts of an old-timey SALT member, I'll go ahead and share.

    In terms of merging groups, having SALT members joining TWE on fimfic and all that, I certainly wouldn't say I'm opposed to the idea. I do, however, wonder about the proposed strictness of requirements for the position of "engineer", which is currently open to anyone with the inclination to freely do on SALT.

    Another thing is the idea of being an admin/mod, and the activity levels expected from such a position. This, for me, is interesting because when I'm part of the leadership of a group, I'm definitely incentivised to be more active, but like Aquillo, I also prefer the ability to pick and choose my tasks as the inclination strikes (especially because of my proofreading's limited scope). Of course, this may not be a major issue either.

    I'd also agree with Burraku, in that like him, I shy away from providing elaborate reviews detailing problems with pace, story, etc., preferring instead to stick to technical aspects such as grammar, spelling, typos, and the like. So, exclusive one-on-one mentoring isn't something I'd really be cut out for. Of course, Plum and Otter have both stated flexibility on that point.

    In the end, my biggest question would be this: what, if such action were taken, would happen to this site? It seems like Aquillo, for one, likes the current structure of this blog, so would the proposed changes really have enough impact to affect what he and some of the others are already doing?

    Maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to figure out how to enact some of these changes while allowing old SALT members to essentially just continue with their current methods. Just my two cents.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. >>Alrighty, well, if anyone wants to hear the thoughts of an old-timey SALT member, I'll go ahead and share.

      TBH, I still very much feel like the new guy at SALT (who's somehow inexplicably helping to run it), so just hearing from old SALT members is awesome in itself.

      As for the structure problems, I'd agree that there's problems with the way our current system's set up. If we don't go through with the merger, then -- seeing as we've got everyone together -- there's some stuff I'd like to run by people.

      Delete
    2. Sounds good to me. (And seeing who's been taking the reigns around here is also a pleasure!)

      After reading through everyone's additional thoughts today, I think it's become somewhat easier to understand where everyone is coming from, and what exactly the ideas being floated by would entail. I've hd a few more opinions on the matter myself, but work unfortunately is preventing me from having the time to go into much detail. Still, I appreciate seeing what seems to have been a healthy discussion concerning the group(s).

      Delete
  8. Something... something I don't believe I'm 100% clear on, now that I've looked through some of Aquillo's and Dan's concerns...

    Like, maybe it's only been wishful thinking on my part up until this point, but the proposal (the second portion, at least; I don't really want any part of the first portion for myself) hasn't actually sounded too different to me from how we handle things now. It would just be on a FimFic group, rather than this blog site. Am I wrong in thinking this?

    Like, the impression I've been getting is that people find/are directed to this proposed group, submit their stories for review/editing, and the group's members either help those people or don't, at their discretion. What sounds like such a change here, exactly? Don't take this as me trying to change your minds: I really want to understand your perspective, as I might wind up adopting it for myself.

    Is it the implications of the term "mentoring"? I had taken that to mean little more than a concentrated, if temporary effort on the part of the editor/proofreader to make the story in question better, and maybe have a conversation or two with the author about what could be worked on. That's kind of what I've always done on SALT anyway, so that didn't sound that bad to me. Is there something I'm missing here?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Some of it. To be blunt, what we do here isn't editing. It's more a mixture of reviewing and light proofreading. Editing requires a long term commitment to making the story better; it requires that you be fully committed to both the story and the author. An editor's intimately involved in how the story grows and develops. You can think of them as being like a second author.

      As it stands, I have only edited for around three people. I have proofread for a much larger number and reviewed for around the same, if not more. Becoming an editor is not something to be taken lightly: it's not something that you can easily wash your hands of. Most editing involves a fairly consistent exchange of ideas, thoughts and musings on a story; it's not just about making corrections to the finished work, it's about being involved in helping make that work.

      Judging from Csquared08's proposal, TWE seems to be under the impression that we're a group of editors. We're not and we never have been; in fact, Ravens has made several attempts to move us away from doing excessive reviewing and proofreading in the past. Our goal is not to help people get onto EQD; it's to save them from getting an unnecessary strike. We have had occasional decadent dalliances with helping certain authors because we like either them or their story, but that has never been our primary goal. Our primary goal is to say whether or not we think the story would get onto EQD and then, should we choose, say why we think it wouldn't. But it's a choice, not an obligation.

      I hope that clears up some of my reasoning behind my concerns. Also, seeing as the end of this section has devolved into a general discussion on how we should respond... I'll go write something.

      Delete
  9. Ho boy, I’ve got a lot of points swimming around and I wonder if I can get them down before they vanish. Here goes.

    >> “one-on-one by a mentor”

    This. This is reason why I jump between SALT and /fic/. I’m not comfortable with /fic/ because it requires you to actually commit to a story and do a complete review. You are expected to finish the story and say a few paragraphs of intelligent words about it because that’s what everyone’s doing there. The lines more the merrier! And if you don’t, well, it wouldn’t be very nice.

    (Already pointed out by Aquillo in his third point.)

    SALT, on the other hand, lets you drop in, make one or two comments and then poof away whenever you feel like it. And you can even come back to it a few days later on continue on! This is partly because there are so little new fics coming in everyday that the one you were looking at would probably still be near the top, and you won’t feel as if you’re digging up and reviewing old junk, and you won’t be overwhelmed by a deluge of new fics either. (>>With regards to SALT needing a bigger pool of reviewers/people requesting help, pointed out by OtterMatt) This happens in SALT precisely because it’s a very tiny community with very little traffic, and I doubt this would be the same once we’ve shifted over to TWE.

    Oh yea and there happens to be a whole bunch of really experienced reviewers in /fic/ which kind of pressure me to come up with really in-depth reviews, but that’s beside the point.


    >>About SALT NOT getting totally absorbed into TWE and disappearing off the face of the internet world...

    I doubt it. Just look at how small we are. In a week or so, more than half of this ‘Engineers’ group (the section where SALT would have shifted to) would consist of members from TWE.
    (“SALT is done in any case”-Ottermatt)


    >>About the benefits of many ‘reviewers to one fic’ reviewing.

    (Already pointed out by B_P)
    (Already settled by Csquared)

    Yea I agree with B_P. I tend to focus on plot and style, while he is really, really sharp at picking out errors with the mechanics. It’s also fun to [s]rip apart a fic[/s] review with someone else. I like it. There’s one fic that Aquillo, B_P, and I reviewed together, and we pointed out lots of different things in an endless string of comments in the sidebar which made the review all rounded and probably more accurate. And it was pretty fun too!

    ReplyDelete
  10. >>” finding the terrible fanfics published on a daily basis and give a review to the author explaining in varying amounts of detail just how bad the story is.”

    And not all of the stories don’t that get into the TWE boards are there because the author wants a review/ wants to improve. Some stories are posted their by readers who think the story is terrible. So I’m wondering how much of our effort put into the review would actually be appreciated by the author.

    I don’t enjoy reviewing stories that are bad to the point of it being hard to read. I just... don’t. There’s just too much basic stuff to point out and I’ll have to explain every single common mistake in detail (What’s Show vs Tell? What’s LUS? What can’t I put my entire chapter into a single paragraph?)

    >>we'd like to see how you handle reviewing something truly awful.

    No, I’d tear my hair out.

    http://www.fimfiction.net/story/54860/1/The-Other-Six/The-Grand-Adventure%28-It%27s-Corny-I-Know%29

    Okay, maybe I was exaggerating, but I’ll probably end up fumbling bad, so I’ll just be heading over to this:

    >>“Additionally, there is also this thread in which anyone can ask for a review of their story, good or bad.”


    Hmm, that’s about it. I’m thinking that we should create a section in TWE for SALT, while leaving the original SALT webpage intact. Link SALT to that section in TWE. Reviewers from SALT should be able to get a feel of what TWE is like before diving in with the merger. It’s somewhat similar to the idea of having SALT run the ‘Engineers’ section I guess.

    Also, I’m much more comfortable reviewing in gdocs. Actually, I’ve only reviewed stuff on there.. could we get people to post gdocs links instead?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Okay, Cheeze & B_P; I'll try to give my perspective on these points as best I can.

    >Is it the implications of the term "mentoring"?
    Frankly, yes, to a degree. The main idea in my head for that concept was that an author would be able to have someone they knew they could go to with questions, rather than merely shouting into a void and waiting for someone to deign to respond to them. A writer would never be locked into only one opinion if they wanted more. The idea is that we can ensure that everyone gets someone at least, and at least in the beginning, they're not getting overwhelmed with potentially conflicting advice.
    To me, while I don't see the "come when you feel like it, do what you want to, and bugger off" approach of SALT as a BAD thing, it's not always helpful, and it's certainly not consistent. One of the concerns the new group would like to address is the process of helping new writers, and to do that, we need an actual process.

    >SALT, on the other hand, lets you drop in, make one or two comments and then poof away whenever you feel like it.
    This is precisely what I'm talking about. This may be good for the editor, but it's not for the writer. It's almost infuriating when someone comes by your story, drops in one thought on one paragraph, and doesn't touch the rest of it. Stories exist as wholes, and I think an editor should at least be willing to help for the whole of the story. Not alone, perhaps, and not indefinitely, but the willingness needs to be there.

    >And not all of the stories don’t that get into the TWE boards are there because the author wants a review/ wants to improve.
    Trust me on this one, if it's on the TWE boards, we most likely won't be touching it. No one is signing up to be some kid's unpaid English teacher. We're there, as SALT is, to help and guide writers who need a little bit of help to become better. I became much better as a writer because I had two people who dedicated themselves to my first story. They stuck with me as I wrote it, and pushed and argued with me over points that were good and bad and why they should or shouldn't be in the story. I'd like to have a place where people know they can get that sort of help when they want it.
    And we would never go to an author. They would strictly come to us.

    >Hmm, that’s about it. I’m thinking that we should create a section in TWE for SALT, while leaving the original SALT webpage intact.
    Yes and no. The greatest weaknesses of SALT (to my mind) are that we lack many people, and we have no process for helping. The forum in question already has people post fics that sit there for quite a while. I picked up two of them just because no one else seems to touch that forum, and there's a lot of that going on here, too. And while I know the "come and go" approach is kind of SALT's thing, I don't think it's all that much of a good thing. Not if you're serious about helping writers.

    >Also, I’m much more comfortable reviewing in gdocs. Actually, I’ve only reviewed stuff on there.. could we get people to post gdocs links instead?
    YES. YES PLEASE. I think what C^2 and the rest have discussed is essentially using the FiMFic forum as a way to match writers up with editors, and then they can go nuts.

    Most of what I've seen so far seems to be a debate over structure. If you like structure, you'll probably like the conversion of SALT over to the new format. If you don't then you'll go back to /fic/. It's just hard for me to tell people to submit their fics to SALT and tell them that "EVENTUALLY, someone might get to it. Maybe. If they're around this week."

    ReplyDelete
  12. >”SALT, on the other hand, lets you drop in, make one or two comments and then poof away whenever you feel like it.”
    >>”Stories exist as wholes, and I think an editor should at least be willing to help for the whole of the story. Not alone, perhaps, and not indefinitely, but the willingness needs to be there.”

    You’re right. There has to be a place where entire stories are given a good and hard look by others, and that place is /fic/, or TWE, or the many many other reviewing sites that I’ve yet to come across. So what’s the use of turning SALT into something that’s been done a hundred times before? If authors want to get their stuff reviewed, why come here then? There are so many other sites to choose from after all. What’s so special about SALT?

    It’ll be great if a story could get a whole review, but potential reviewers would be turned off by having to do one. If you ask me to choose between getting three lines of comments and having none at all, I’d take the three lines of comments.


    >> And we would never go to an author. They would strictly come to us.

    Ahh, excellent.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. TWE is not near the level of /fic/; not even close. There's a huge difference between pointing out what's wrong with a bad fic and finding the subtle spanner inside an otherwise well functioning machine. /fic/ can handle the latter; I have yet to see TWE do so. That we would be expected to review a bad fic before entry is somewhat indicative of it.

      Delete
    2. (speaking out of my ass here) I would think it hard to imagine that you would be required to do so unless you wanted to actually join the TWE proper, and that's just the entry for all candidates.
      This group would be separate with an independent mission. SALT already has a track record of helping writers, so I would assume it would just be down to if you wanted to put in the commitment to join, and where in the ladder you wanted to be.
      Again, that's just my take.

      Delete
    3. >There has to be a place where entire stories are given a good and hard look by others, and that place is /fic/, or TWE, or the many many other reviewing sites that I’ve yet to come across.

      /fic/ is great, but so many people don't know anything about it, and the idea of submitting to another site can be intimidating, as well as going around trying to pair yourself up with editors you've never heard from before. I know my first try at SALT was to me. And the TWE is merely a first-line attack against the most obvious and repetitive fouls against prose. They're not nearly set up for editing. But, they are extremely well known, and they get requests for editing pretty constantly. This is an effort to add an editing wing onto the name everyone already knows.

      As for the dedication issue, yeah, I don't think it's a secret that we're looking for people who can and will see a fic through for at least one whole pass.

      Delete
  13. >> And we would never go to an author. They would strictly come to us.

    Small concern about that: I recall being told that authors might be directed to us. Like, if they seem to meet that criteria of "not quite there". I would prefer this, because if we ONLY get stories from authors who find us, where's any semblance of quality control?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Absolutely. The TWE aren't editors, their job is to try to head off bad writers before they become endemic. If someone out there has potential and needs help, they would be referred to the group to get it.
      My suggestion would be that submissions would be vetted by an admin or mod for initial quality so that we're not stuck doing endless "Add comma, 20 Goto 10" loops with an author.

      Delete