Blatant copy/pasta from my previous post.
Showing is a form of writing, one that allows the reader to immerse
him/herself into the story and to visualize the world that the author is
creating. Because of the powerful impact that it has, and the
incredible ability to aid in storytelling, showing has become one of the
most powerful tools at an author’s disposition. So much so, that a lack
of show, will usually be denied. So, how do you “show” in fiction. You
can’t post images, or picture diagrams or sketches. You need to paint
with words. For obvious reasons this can be difficult.
Telling (in regards to fiction) is the act of writing part by part what’s going on, for example:
“Applejack went to Sweet Apple Acres. She was afraid and in a panic”
I just told you something. It’s simple, concise and easy to
understand. Unfortunately, it’s far from immersive, nor is it really
interesting. There’s no atmosphere, or feeling or emotion, it’s raw,
worthy of an outline perhaps, but not an entire story.
“Applejack ran towards the quickly approaching barn, the red edifice
glowing in the afternoon sun. She panted, exerting herself as her
hooves struck the ground with thundering blows.”
That one was a little showy. Note how it has a lot more feeling to
it, you can almost feel that Applejack is in a hurry, or that she is
panicking. And yet, it covers the same material. Showing is always
better than telling, but that does not mean that telling has no place in
fiction. Telling can be used for quick transitions, or blatant
exposition. And in the end, Showing is telling, but indirectly.
Now, I know you guys want to know exactly how to show. So here’s a few (and by that I mean two) methods.
First, imagine the scene. No, I don’t mean like an outline, ‘this
happens, then that, the she says this...’. Immerse yourself in it,
imagine yourself there. Look at the characters, the world around them,
note the smaller details your mind conjures up. Writers and readers have
six senses use them.
--Sight. What you can see, this is where most writing is done. Use
sun, moon, lighting and colours to your advantage, show what’s going on.
--Hearing. Basically all sounds, dialogue isn’t part of this, unless
a tone is added (she squeaked, hollered...ect). This includes parts of
the environment. Outside? Are birds chirping? Foals playing? A fire
crackling?
--Smell. Rarely used, which is unfortunate, it can have quite an
effect on the reader. Covers all odours, things you could smell, from
the cloying smell of garden flowers, the thick smoke of spent gunpowder
to the twingy, copper-like smell of blood.
--Taste. This one is fairly hard to use, simply because the
character has to put something in its mouth. Still, it’s a valid sense.
Pickled eggs have a very different taste than a hay sandwich.
--Touch. Another that is overlooked. Make your character touch
things, feel them. Objects all have their own textures and readers can
easily relate to this. Cold and warmth are also part of this, as is
temperature.
--And finally, thought. Yes, thoughts are a sense, not in the real
world, but in fiction they are as important as any of the rest. In first
person, this is easy, and it’s almost a must. In non-omnipresent third,
it’s a little tougher. You can reach it via dialogue or body language. A
pony that’s leaning forward, face red with a huge frown on their face
isn’t having happy thoughts. One that is leaned back, with a small,
contented smile on its lips might be.
The general rule of thumb is to use all five within every thousand
words. That will really immerse the reader, and it’s also an effective
method of showing.
The second tip I want to give is a bit of a cheat, and that means that I use it all the time.
Instead of outright telling:
"Twilight punched Spike. He flew backwards and crashed into Stephan Magnet."
Tell the reader of the consequences or effects on the environment of each action:
"Twilight’s hoof flew forward, rending the air until it impacted
with Spike’s face with a sickening crunch. The tiny green and purple
dragon flew into the air, shrieking in pain as he vaulted across the
ground. Behind Spike’s tumbling form, Stephan Magnet’s eyes widened, but
he didn’t move until Spike crashed into him with a dull thud."
I just used tell, three times. About little, unimportant thing. But
together and arranged in the right order, it looks as if I’m showing you
a scene. Apply this trick with the one above (using sense) and you can
actually get away with quite a bit.
The amount of showing and the depth of the details depend upon prose, and the writer (context too)
Showing and telling is subjective. Different readers will have different views on what is ‘showing’ or what is ‘telling’. Basically, as long as the reader does not feel immersed into the story or scene that you are writing, chances are he would say that you are telling instead of showing.
ReplyDeleteAlso, sometimes you might want to tell instead of show. Sounds odd huh? Take that first example on Applejack making a trip to Sweet Apple Acres. To show that out, you need to expand on it. Perhaps you might describe the warm sunny weather, or the various ponies she met along the way, or even some wild critter that crossed her path. You will begin describing things, adding on details. Then, after you’ve written a whole scene on that and done a fantastic job at showing it out, you would come to realise that it becomes somewhat bland. No one wants to read a scene about Applejack taking a perfectly fine walk to Sweet Apple Acres. We are looking for something more exciting instead. Instead, it would be better to just summarise the entire chunk into one or two lines of telling.
Readers don’t want to dwell on these little points, and neither should you. In essence, you need to have a mixture of show and tell. Show the exciting bits, tell the boring bits.